Knowledge, Safety, and Questions
Vol 17, No 1 (2016) • Filosofia Unisinos - Unisinos Journal of Philosophy
Autor: Brian Ball
Resumo:
Safety-based theories of knowledge face a difficulty surrounding necessary truths: no subject could have easily falsely believed such a proposition. Failing to predict that ill-grounded beliefs in such propositions do not constitute knowledge, standard safety theories are therefore less informative than desired. Some have suggested that the subjects at issue could easily have believed some related false proposition; but they have given no indication as to what makes a proposition related. I suggest a solution to this problem: a belief is safe iff its subject could not easily have believed a false answer to the same question.
ISSN: ISSN: 1984-8234
Texto Completo: http://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/filosofia/article/view/fsu.2016.171.07
Palavras-Chave: epistemology,knowledge,problem of necessary t
Filosofia Unisinos - Unisinos Journal of Philosophy
The journal Filosofia Unisinos - Unisinos Journal of Philosophy is published once every four months by Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos.
Articles must be original, unpublished, and not under consideration for publication anywhere else and can be written in Portuguese, English or Spanish
Filosofia Unisinos - Unisinos Journal of Philosophy prints articles, translations and critical book reviews. It also reprints papers that are considered fundamental to the area when authorized written permission is given by the original publisher.