Does moral responsibility require mental time travel? Considerations about guidance control
Vol 19, No 1 (2018) • Filosofia Unisinos - Unisinos Journal of Philosophy
Autor: Beatriz Sorrentino Marques
Resumo:
The debate about moral responsibility for one’s actions often revolves around whether the agent had the ability to do otherwise. An alternative account of moral responsibility, however, focuses on the actual sequence that produces the agent’s action and which criteria it must fulfil for the agent to be considered morally responsible for her action. Mental Time Travel allows the agent to simulate a possible future scenario; therefore, it is relevant for the selection of a course of action. I will argue that implicit prospection is a rudimentary form of Mental Time Travel and that the role that implicit prospection, or non-rudimentary forms of Mental Time Travel, plays in the production of intentional actions helps explain guidance control and, hence, moral responsibility.
ISSN: ISSN: 1984-8234
Texto Completo: http://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/filosofia/article/view/fsu.2018.191.10
Palavras-Chave: implicit prospection,guidance control,feeling
Filosofia Unisinos - Unisinos Journal of Philosophy
The journal Filosofia Unisinos - Unisinos Journal of Philosophy is published once every four months by Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos.
Articles must be original, unpublished, and not under consideration for publication anywhere else and can be written in Portuguese, English or Spanish
Filosofia Unisinos - Unisinos Journal of Philosophy prints articles, translations and critical book reviews. It also reprints papers that are considered fundamental to the area when authorized written permission is given by the original publisher.