Quod Tibi Fieri Non Vis, Alteri ne Feceris: A Crítica de Habermas à Regra de Ouro
Vol 20, No 3 (2016) • Principia: an international journal of epistemology
Autor: Delamar José Volpato Dutra
Resumo:
The text presents Habermas’ analysis and criticism of the role that the Golden Rule plays in Hobbes’s system. According to Habermas, the golden rule suggests the kind of arguments that Hobbes would need to deduce the natural laws, which Hobbes intends to draw only from the interested perspective of the rational selfish ego. Next, the paper presents the same criticism to Rawls, but this time based on the analysis of the strategy of the original position. The paper concludes that the contractualist strategy of both thinkers import a cognitive deficit in the sense of being unable to account for the principles of justice based on equality and freedom, that is, on the impartial point of view that would serve the interest of all.
ISSN: 1414-4217
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/808-1711.2016v20n3p377
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/808-1711.2016v20n3p377/33940
Palavras-Chave: Habermas,Hobbes,golden rule,Rawls,original po
Principia: an international journal of epistemology
!["PRINCIPIA]("http://anpof.org/portal/images/portal_periodicos_eletronicos_2017/PRINCIPIA-CABECALHO.jpg")
"Principia: an international journal of epistemology" was founded in 1997 and regularly publishes articles, discussions and review. The journal aims to publish original scholarly work especially in epistemology area , with an emphasis on material of general interest to academic philosophers. Originally published only in print version (ISSN: 1414-4247), in 2005 the journal began to be published also in online version (ISSN: 1808-1711). Since 1999 are published three issues per year: in April, August and December. Qualis CAPES: A2